MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118707135 · doi:10.65264/chej8767

Article 12: Implementation of an Evidence-Based Programme for Justice Involved Women in Namibia

2025· article· W7118707135 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ndeyapo E. Nafuka, Atty Twahafifwa Mwafufya

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvancing Corrections Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticeService (business)Criminal justiceService delivery frameworkRehabilitationProgram evaluation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historically evidence-based programmes in corrections have been developed to address the needs of males, who comprise the majority of the inmate population. However, many studies have identified significant differences between women and male offenders and their implications in criminal offending. Today there is general consensus that the criminogenic factors for justice involved women are distinct from those of men. Consequently, this has led to the development of gender specific programmes for women. Western correctional jurisdictions have designed and implemented a number of these gender specific programmes that recognise women's unique pathways into crime. Unfortunately, the same has not been the case in most African correctional jurisdictions. The Namibian Correctional Service (NCS) stands out as one of the few correctional jurisdictions within Africa that have introduced a gender-specific programme for women. The programme which is titled simply, "A Women's Programme", was adopted from Canada. The programme is consistent with the risk-needs- responsivity principle which underpins the Namibian Correctional Service rehabilitation framework. The programme is delivered to higher risk women, it appropriately addresses some of the unique criminogenic needs of justice involved women and it was designed in content and style of delivery to engage women. This paper highlights how a western developed evidence-based programme can be realistically implemented in the African context. In addition, the paper discusses some innovative strategies employed by the consultants in designing the programme and adopted by programme officers from the NCS in its implementation, to ensure that the programme would be relatable to the Namibian women offender population. An informal evaluation of a pilot implementation of the programme revealed that participants perceived it as promoting their self-efficacy and empowerment. Participants further stated that the programme increased insight into themselves, their past traumas, their crimes, and their relationships, leading to greater self-awareness and a sense of hope for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvancing Corrections JournalSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207