MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Implementation Nursing Education and Administration Theories Application Using the E-Mind Map on Self-Regulated Learning and Student Academic Performance

2025· article· en· W7118757498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
hala mohamed elrayes, jehan mohamed mostafa, Wessam Mohamed El-Behaidy

Bibliographic record

VenueHelwan International Journal of Nursing Research and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicE-Learning and COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNurse educationTest (biology)Nursing researchScope (computer science)Data collectionGraduate studentsAcademic yearQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The world uses a wide scope of different advanced applications and services, to be involved across different settings in various circumstances. Educational technology has become the prevailing medium of the era, enabling effective interaction between teachers and learners to facilitate the learning process. The aim of the study was to explore effect of implementation of nursing education and administration theories application using the e-mind map on self-regulated learning and student academic performance. Research Design: `Quasi-experimental research design. Study Setting: The study conducted at the Faculty of Nursing at Helwan University. Subjects : total number of 85 post graduate PHD and doctorate students. Tools of data collection; Data for this research were obtained using three distinct forms First tool: Self ‑regulated learning questionnaire, Second Tools: Student Academic Performance questionnaire. Results: More than nearly all of participants (91.8%) of the studied nursing post-graduate students gained a high level of self‑regulated learning during the post-test phase, followed by the phase of follow-up test most all (83.5%) as compared with the phase of the pre-test less than one quarter. More than nearly all (91.8%) of the nursing post-graduate students studied gained a high level of student academic performance during the post-test phase. The follow-up test phase accounted for more than most of student participants ( 85.9%) , which is substantially near quarter (24.7% )observed during the pre-test phase . Conclusion: Theories using the E-Mind map application had positive large effect size on self-regulated learning and student academic performance. Recommendation: Educational program Supposed be conducted for all nursing students to be more skillful about electronic learning applications, E-mind maps, and self -regulated learning skills .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.523 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelwan International Journal of Nursing Research and PracticeSame topicE-Learning and COVID-19French-language works237,207