MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118888984 · doi:10.15113/0002001329

21世紀第1四半期における麦作の生産構造をめぐる動向 : 統計分析による各農業地域の特徴の析出

2025· article· ja· W7118888984 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
英信 横山, Hidenobu Yokoyama

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationStatistical analysisAgricultureAgricultural productivityProduction (economics)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ⅰ 課題の設定 Ⅱ 4麦作付面積の推移の特徴 1 全国の4麦作付面積の推移の概況 2 北海道・都府県別,小麦・大裸麦別に見た特徴 3 北海道・都府県別,田作麦・畑作麦別に見た特徴 4 4麦作付面積の推移と麦作の生産構造 Ⅲ 都府県の各農業地域の麦作の特徴 1 各農業地域の麦作の概況 2 小麦・大裸麦別に見た特徴 3 田作麦・畑作麦をめぐる状況と特徴 Ⅳ 各農業地域の田作麦をめぐる状況 1 麦に係る「水田活用の直接支払交付金」の「基幹」「二毛作」別支払動向 2 都府県の各農業地域の裏作田比率と「基幹」「二毛作」との関連 3 各農業地域の田本地面積に占める4麦作付面積の比率 Ⅴ 作付規模別階層の動向から見た麦作の構造変動 1 麦類作付経営体の作付規模別経営体数比率の動向 2 小麦作付経営体の作付規模別経営体数比率及び作付面積比率の動向 Ⅵ むすび

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.018
Scholarly communication0.0130.011
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementFrench-language works237,207