MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118973872 · doi:10.32782/wba.2025.2.12

Results of the sociological research «Kakhovka reservoir: past, present, and future»

2025· article· W7118973872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater bioresources and aquaculture · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resources and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSociological researchKey (lock)Field (mathematics)Sociological theoryResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The full-scale russian invasion of Ukraine has caused great human, environmental, and economic losses.The situation was complicated by the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station dam, which drained the reservoir and destroyed the main source of water supply for southern Ukraine.This negatively affected the environment and triggered a socio-economic crisis in the regions dependent on irrigated agriculture.Therefore, in the post-war period, an important step is to reassess the priority of sustainable development goals for southern Ukraine to ensure the survival, return and continued existence of the population, and the potential for development of the territories.In this context, it is essential to consider public opinion and the perspective of the local population regarding regional strategies and measures for the post-war restoration of the affected areas.The results of our social research showed that 79.4% of respondents depended on the Kakhovka reservoir for their livelihoods and economic activities, and 85.7% of respondents believed that the prosperity of the Kherson region depended on the functioning of the reservoir.It was found that 81.5% of respondents consider it necessary to restore, fill, and operate the reservoir using new technologies.In particular, 65.8% of respondents believe that post-war recovery decisions should be based on the collective vision of scientists, government and local authorities, international experts, and business representatives.It was discovered that 54% of respondents preferred the awareness of the scientific community, the authenticity and reliability of information in scientific publications.88.0% of the respondents are of the opinion that draining the Kakhovka reservoir is a complex problem of ensuring the continued existence of the region in terms of economy, ecology, and social security.Discussion of the problems of restoring the Kakhovka reservoir is relevant since 94.8% of respondents currently live in the damaged areas or plan to return there after the war.Thus, the scale and damage from the destruction of the Kakhovka reservoir by the occupying forces is determined by the severity of environmental and socio-economic consequences, as well as the possibility of post-war restoration of damaged territories according to the local population's vision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it