MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119067105 · doi:10.65564/pjim.d5622d5964

Prognostic Impact of Coronary Collaterals in Acute Coronary Syndrome (PICC-ACS): A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

2017· article· W7119067105 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Daniel A Ramos, Jaime Alfonso M Aherrera, Lowe Chiong, Mark A Vicente, Felix Eduardo R. Punzalan, Richard Henry P. Tiongco

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilippine Journal of Internal Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute coronary syndromeObservational studyConfoundingCollateral circulationLogistic regressionPopulationCoronary artery disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The coronary collateral circulation (CCC) is an alternative source of blood supply in coronary artery disease (CAD). The prognostic value of the presence of CCC at the time of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is undefined with regards to hard outcomes, particularly reduction in mortality. The study's aim is to determine if the presence of CCC demonstrated by coronary angiography during an ACS is associated with a reduction in mortality. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of studies using MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases in all languages and examined reference lists of studies. The inclusion criteria were 1) observational; 2) population included adults >19 years old with an acute coronary syndrome; 3) reported data on mortality in association with the presence or absence of CCC on angiography; and 4) should have controlled for confounders by using logistic regression analysis. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies. The outcome of interest was reduction in all-cause mortality, assessed using Mantel-Haenzel analysis of random effects to compute for risk ratios. Results: Pooled analysis from 11 identified trials with 8,370 subjects showed that among patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography, the presence of CCC showed a trend towards benefit in terms of mortality, but was not statistically different from those without CCC [RR 0.65, (95% CI 0.38 to 1.12), p<0.0001, I2=74%]. In those ACS patients with CCC treated with PCI, a significant reduction in mortality was found [RR 0.43, (95% CI 0.29 to 0.64), p< 0.0001, I2=0%]. Conclusion: The presence of CCC during ACS showed a trend towards mortality reduction. Further, among patients treated with PCI, those with CCC had an incrementally significant reduction in mortality compared to those without CCC. Keywords: coronary collaterals, acute coronary syndrome

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.052
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilippine Journal of Internal Medicine→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→