MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rescue of indigenous knowledge in the practice of integrated fire management, TIs Xerente e Funil, Tocantínia, Tocantins, Brasil

2020· article· en· W7119108982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pedro Paulo Gomes da Silva Xerente, Rejane Carneiro Salvador de Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousMetisTraditional knowledgeFirefightingVegetation (pathology)Fire controlGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Xerente Indigenous Communities, resident in the Xerente and Funil Indigenous Lands (TIs), located in the Cerrado biome, city of Tocantínia, Tocantins, Brazil, contribute to the Federal Brigades Program from Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA) and implemented by the National Center for Forest Fire Prevention and Fighting (PREVFOGO), which has as one of its main objectives to implement Integrated Fire Management in Indigenous Lands, both in preventing and fighting forest fires. The Program began in 2013 and the Xerente people with their knowledge and experience had a great influence on changing forest fire prevention strategies, since these fire were indeed severe and degraded their fauna and flora. The Indigenous people collaborated with the Xerente Indigenous Federal Brigade, which operates in the two aforementioned TIs. At the beginning of the Program's execution , there were some disagreements with the traditional knowledge, because during the Brigade Formation course, promoted by PREVFOGO/IBAMA, the Brigadistas were instructed not to let it burn, and that, all detected fire should be extinguished. Thus, there were a conflict between indigenous culture and the strategy adopted by the Brigade, as the Elders (older indigenous) did not accept this strategy and began to advise the Brigadists about the importance of using fire in the post-rain season, when vegetation is still damp, preventing the managed fire from becoming a forest fire and knowing where it would naturally go out. Meetings between PREVFOGO/IBAMA servants and Elders occurred and there they described the way their ancestors managed fire. The servants valued these popular wisdom and it was build a historical landmark of trust, participation, knowledge exchange and zeal for use of fire. Strategies to prevent major fires were jointly developed. Thus, there was a rescue of the use of fire by the Xerente People, through prescribed burns following the recommendations of the Elders, based on the themes: clearing fire for hunting, cleaning around the villages and farms, ensuring fruiting and escape route to animals. In this sense, every year there has been a reduction of major fires in the Xerente and Funil ITs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryFrench-language works237,207