MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119270393

Implementation of a health-promoting school program in Belo Horizonte: systematization and adaptation of the operational model

2023· dissertation· pt· W7119270393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Nakao

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Adaptation (eye)ComprehensionCharterLicense
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Affordable Health Initiative's health-promoting school model (AHI HPS model) incorporates the principles of the Ottawa Charter from the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNESCO's Health-Promoting Schools initiative. Recognizing the significance of this initiative in driving social transformation and reducing inequalities, a team of researchers from the School of Dentistry at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, in collaboration with the Affordable Health Initiative (AHI) from the United Kingdom, is implementing the AHI HPS model in Belo Horizonte. Therefore, this study aimed to systematize, translate, and adapt the operational model to the context of schools in Belo Horizonte as part of the implementation research of AHI HPS model within this municipality. A universalist approach was adopted, including the steps of semantic equivalence, which involves the systematization of the operational model, translation, synthesis, review by the Expert Committee, and approval of the final version by the author of the AHI HPS operational model. Initially, the systematization of the original operational model, available in the English language on the AHI web platform, was carried out. Following that, the translation into Brazilian Portuguese was independently conducted by two bilingual translators. The synthesis of the translation was submitted to a Committee of 23 basic education teachers through a digital form (Google Forms®), divided into three blocks and further subdivided into smaller parts. The operational model was evaluated for language, clarity, and text comprehension until a 75% agreement was achieved. Perceptions and suggestions were recorded in the comments. In the first round, only the part "Run life and health coaching" in Block 1 had agreement less than 75% regarding clarity. The teachers indicated that the term "coaching" referred to a teaching model not adopted in schools. The text was rewritten and organized to facilitate the description of this section of the operational model. Furthermore, the review incorporated textual and orthographic changes, replacements, or clarifications of terms or words that were not well understood, descriptions of concepts, and adjustments to adapt interventions to the local context and in alignment with current policies. In the second round, there was 100% agreement for all criteria, and no new comments were received. Therefore, the revised version of the operational model was sent to the author of AHI HPS model for evaluation and approval. The author suggested some changes to the titles of the sections of the operational model, which were incorporated: "Run life and health coaching" (introduction, e-learning, quiz, debate, group discussion, individual goal) of Blocks 1 and 2 were changed to "Life Skills Literacy and Health Literacy"; "Sports Tournaments" became "Physical Activities Outside of School (Sports)"; "Active Commuting" was changed to "Physical Activities Outside of School (Active Commuting)". In conclusion, the operational model of AHI HPS model, translated into Brazilian Portuguese, has been culturally adapted to the reality of Brazil, encompassing local school policies, and it will be a relevant technical product for the implementation of the intervention in schools in Belo Horizonte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.058
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0580.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207