MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119285192

Multiplication of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) by cuttings.

2009· dissertation· pt· W7119285192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. C. Ristow

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarPerliteVegetative reproductionPlant growthGrowing seasonBerryVaccinium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blueberry is a temperate fruit species climate, cultivated in Europe, in the United State and Canada, where it has a great economic importance. Its cultivation has driven to a significant expansion in the last years, due to the fruit nutritional characteristics. Blueberries are rich in vitamins and minerals, low calorie and have high antioxidant concentration, establishing a demanding market in healthy foods. The supply of uniform plants with high quality and the development of an efficient and competitive production system added to marketing strategies are among the technologies to be adapted. The objectives of this work were: (i) to determine a suitable substrate to vegetative propagation by microcutting technique and blueberry plant growth; (ii) validate the technique of microcutting; (iii) to evaluate rooting and surviving capacity of blueberry microcuttings. Different experiments were done to achieve the objectives. It was evaluated growth of in vitro-originated plant of cultivar Georgiagem in different substrates. The microcuttings were kept under moist micro-environment conditions at both regulated temperature and light. It was evaluated the blueberry microcutting technique to the cultivars Georgiagem, O‟Neal and Misty under moist micro-environment method, two microcuttings collection period and two IBA concentrations. Was evaluated plant surviving of the cultivars Georgiagem and O‟Neal. Also, it was verified rooting potential of blueberry microcutting treated with different concentrations of indolbutiric acid (IBA) in powder formulation. It was concluded that the substrates such as pinus needle + soil and plantmax®, followed by plantmax® + perlite and rice rull + soil promoted better blueberry plant development of the cv. Georgiagem. The substrates sphagnum peat moss and the mixes of peat + perlite, peat + perlite + coconut fiber and peat + perlite + sawdust allowed higher rooting percentage. The results referent to microcutting rooting, showing high levels of rooting for the cultivars Misty, O'Neal and Georgiagem. The plant surviving of blueberry cultivars O‟Neal and Georgiagem propagated by microcutting method was superior to 90%. The application of 4000 mg/kg of IBA promoted the best rooting rates and root volume of blueberry microcuttings cultivar Climax, showing rooting percentage of 91,67.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicPlant tissue culture and regeneration→French-language works237,207→