MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119349147

Short-term effects of anthropogenic sediment additions on biogeochemical properties of the Fraser River Estuary

2025· other· en· W7119349147 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yuehao Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleEstuaryBenthic zoneIntertidal zoneSedimentEcosystemHabitatOrganic matter
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intertidal mudflats are globally important ecosystems in estuaries. In the Fraser River Estuary in British Columbia, Canada, these habitats host diverse surficial biofilms (microphytobenthos and other microorganisms) that underpin several important functions, including supporting estuarine food webs, biogeochemical cycling, the latter including nutrient provisioning that sustains benthic productivity. However, these habitats are suffering from elevation loss and habitat degradation due to sediment deficit, elevated salinity, relative sea-level rise, and herbivory of migratory birds. Recently, mudflats at Sturgeon Bank, Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia, Canada, have received managed sediment additions as part of the broader Sturgeon Bank Sediment Enhancement Pilot Project at the estuary. The short-term biogeochemical responses of intertidal biofilms can be used as an early signal to assess restoration effectiveness and to predict potential ecological outcomes of restoration interventions. This study compared sediment attributes (organic matter, photosynthetic pigments, and fatty acid composition) at Sturgeon Bank at treatment and control sites under a modified Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) design, spanning four sampling years in the springs from 2022 to 2024 and from winter to summer in 2025. Linear-mixed effects modelling and analysis of variance revealed that the studied parameters varied annually from 2022 to 2025, with few differences between treatment and control sites, and only a significant treatment-by-year interaction for organic matter in 2025. However, fatty acid analyses indicated potential shifts in the community composition of intertidal biofilm towards greater contributions of dinoflagellates and bacteria at treatment sites. These findings demonstrate that estuarine mudflat ecosystems are highly dynamic and can be resilient to anthropogenic sediment additions. Interannual variability in hydrodynamics and climate were important factors in changes to biofilm biomass, nutritional quality, and phytoplankton taxonomic composition, with mud surface temperature, solar radiation, and freshet-induced salinity fluctuations exerting stronger impacts than the sediment treatment itself. These results highlight the significance of integrating biogeochemical monitoring with traditional physical and meteorological metrics to accurately assess restoration outcomes in dynamic estuaries. This study provides a foundation for adaptive management strategies and informs blue carbon accounting efforts in sediment-deficient coastal ecosystems globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→French-language works237,207→