A diluição do sentido público da/na educação infantil: problematizando a privatização educacional em diálogo com Hannah Arendt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work investigates the dilution of the public meaning of/in education by means of an exploratory study carried out via bibliographical research, with a systematic integrative method, of theses and dissertations that discuss privatization experiences in early childhood education. It aims to analyze how privatization processes have reverberated in early childhood education and constituted a herald in the formulation of its policies, diluting its public meaning. The research identifies and analyzes 19 theses and dissertations defended between 2016 and 2022 that discuss the insurgency of private programs within public early childhood education institutions. It presents the effects of the permeability of borders between the public and private sectors on daycare and preschool, through theoretical references such as Adrião (2022; 2020), Peroni (2021), Freitas (2019) and Laval and Dardot (2016; 2017), among others. With Arendt (2020; 2019), Carvalho (2017a; 2017b; 2008) and Almeida (2011) weaves a reflective effort around the meaning of the public sense of education and the consequences of its emptying in the face of the disturbance of privatizations on early childhood education. It identifies that, although the researches analyzed present alarming questions about the negative effects of privatizations in daycare and preschool, the gap in works that discusses the effects of privatizations on children's education is an important aspect of problematization. It confirms the research hypothesis and concludes that educational privatizations, in addition to diluting the public meaning of education, represent a latent threat to the constitution of children and early childhood education professionals since, instead of dealing with the formation of their subjectivities, they establish logics that are foreign to early childhood education, such as competitiveness, individualism, precarious teaching work and child care. In dialogue with Arendt, this work re-signifies the human formation processes, giving centrality to the public dimension of this experience and points to the need for an education whose horizon is referenced in public virtues, which reflects on a constitution of subjects with a deep ethical and political sense, since childhood education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".