MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119379218

Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women under Monitoring in Pre Distinct Prenatal Services: The Metropolitan Area and the Rural Environment

2015· dissertation· pt· W7119379218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline San Severino Teixeira, Antônio Carlos Vieira Cabral

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaPregnancyAttendanceSocioeconomic statusPrenatal careWeight gainQuarter (Canadian coin)Rural areaFirst trimester
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy is a period that requires increased nutritional needs, an adequate nutrition is essential to the health of mother and baby. Pregnants should consume foods in variety and specific amount considering the recommendations of the food guides and cultural food practices, to achieve the energy and nutrient requirements, and the weight gain recommendations. Purpose: To verify differences in some nutritional aspects of pregnant women assisted in prenatal care service in a contry town and in a metropolitan area. Methods: Pregnant women were evaluated in prenatal care in the city of Belo Horizonte (BH), metropolitan area, and Paula Cândido (PC), a country town. It was applied a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) containing socioeconomic information and on their eating habits. Moreover, were mensured height and weight at the time of attendance and questioned the pre-pregnancy weight, for subsequent calculation of BMI. Data analysis was divided by region and pregnancy trimester using the SPSS software version 15.0, the t-test to compare averages and chi-square test of independence with 5% significance. Results: 240 pregnant women were included, 90 from the country town and 150 from the metropolitan area. Of these, most are married (BH = 56.67%; PC = 46.67%), do not work outside the home (BH = 54.67%; PC = 84.44%). Predominantly feed 3-4 times/day on the 1st and 2nd quarters (BH = 54% and 46%; PC = 66.7% and 63.33%, respectively) and make 5-6 meals/day in Q3 in BH (44%). There was significant weight gain only in the 1st pregnancy quarter (BH: 58%; PC: 53.33%). Weight gain versus eating habits was significant for the variables "lunch or dinner away from home" in the 1st quarter BH (p = 0.006); "How many times consume milk" in the 1st quarter PC (p = 0.03); "How many times consume junk food" in the 3rd quarter BH (p = 0.009). Conclusions: Pregnant woman in both regions feed properly, despite the prevalence of pre gestational overweight in BH and low level of education and income, especially in the country town, an indicator that may be unfavorable to the nutrition of pregnant women in this period. Association studies between eating habits and newborn health will contribute to more information about nutrition during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→