A RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DO TRANSPORTADOR AÉREO: UM BREVE COTEJAMENTO ENTRE O CÓDIGO BRASILEIRO DE AERONÁUTICA E INOVAÇÕES POSTERIORES À CONSTITUIÇÃO DE 1988
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo analisa a responsabilidade civil do transportador aéreo, cotejandoaspectos do Código Brasileiro de Aeronáutica e alguns parâmetros fixados por convençõesinternacionais, como Varsóvia e Montreal, recepcionados pelo Direito brasileiro, emcomparação com as bases jurídicas erguidas após a Constituição de 1988, que inclui a disciplinado seu artigo 37, parágrafo 6º, referente à responsabilização civil do Estado e das pessoasjurídicas de direito privado prestadoras de serviço público, bem como outras leis de grandeamplitude, como o Código Civil, de 2002, e o Código de Defesa do Consumidor, de 1990,promotoras da reformulação de entendimentos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais concernentes àtemática. A metodologia da pesquisa é qualitativa, descritiva e analítica, a partir de fontesbibliográficas e documentais, tendo por escopo central demonstrar algumas evoluções, a partirde análise que cobre cerca de quatro décadas de abordagens sobre esse importante tema doDireito Aeronáutico brasileiro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".