MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119395769

A Strategic Framework to Support Scientific Communications for Mars Sample Return Science: Overview and Status

2025· other· en· W7119395769 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. L. Harris, T. Haltigin, M. P. Zorzano, A. W. Steele, S. Edwin, D. Beaty, Audrey Bouvier, B. L. Carrier, A. D. Czaja, Nicolas Dauphas, K. L. French, D P Glavin, L. J. Hallis, Ernst Hauber, L. E. Hays, Aurore Hützler, Gerhard Kminek, E. Sefton-Nash, L. E. Rodriguez, S.P. Schwenzer, F. Thiessen, M. T. Thorpe, K. T. Tait, M. A. Velbel, Jessica Vanhomwegen, T. Usui

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Space AgencyCanadian Space AgencyUK Space AgencyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCornerstoneMars Exploration ProgramSample (material)Strategic planningScientific communicationStrategic communicationSustainabilityScience communication
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The joint NASA/ESA Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign is a cornerstone of both agencies’ long-term scientific exploration strategy that would revolutionize our understanding of the history of Mars, the Solar System, and the potential for life beyond Earth. In 2023, findings from an Independent Review Board (IRB-2) emphasized the need for clear and compelling communication of MSR’s scientific and strategic value to Congress, the scientific community, and the public [1]. In response, NASA’s Science Mission Directorate’s MSR IRB-2 Response Team (MIRT) acknowledged the critical need for strengthening and enhancing strategic communications to ensure mission success and public support [2].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)French-language works237,207