Estilo de vida e saúde mental dos adolescentes da microrregião de Joaçaba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the lifestyle and mental health of adolescents in the Joaçaba microregion. This is a quantitative cross-sectional epidemiological study. The sample consisted of 1,769 adolescents aged 12 to 15 years, of which 844 (47.71%) were female and 925 (52.29%) were male. Data were collected through questionnaires. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HAD (Botega et al., 1995) was used to measure symptoms of depression and anxiety. The self-administered questionnaire Fantastic Lifestyle, proposed by the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP, 1994), was used to verify lifestyle. The mean, standard deviation and Pearson correlation were used for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05. Regarding lifestyle, 359 adolescents were found with a classification of needs improvement and poor. On the other hand, 1,410 adolescents were classified as good, very good and excellent. In anxiety symptoms, 374 adolescents were identified as having a probable outcome and 219 adolescents were identified as having depression symptoms. Adolescents who were classified as having a lifestyle that needs improvement demonstrated the highest mean scores for anxiety and depression symptoms, with 11.5 and 10.86 points, respectively. For both anxiety and depression, the results were significant when compared with lifestyle (p<0.05). In the Joaçaba microregion, adolescents have a high frequency of anxiety and depression symptoms and a significant relationship with lifestyle, raising concerns about the future of these adolescents in relation to their health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".