MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119470057 · doi:10.70651/3041-2498/2025.11.02

THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE FORMATION OF MECHANISMS FOR PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT IN THE HEALTHCARE SECTOR

2025· article· W7119470057 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mykola Pylypiv

Bibliographic record

VenueПублічне управління і політика. · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor Market and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceIncentiveHealth careHuman resource managementQuality (philosophy)Workforce developmentPrivate sectorPublic sectorHuman resources

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes foreign experiences in shaping mechanisms of public personnel management in the healthcare sector, based on a comparative study of practices in Japan, the USA, Germany, and Canada. It is shown that the effectiveness of human resource management in the medical field largely depends on a combination of state regulation, stable financing, professional development of personnel and incentive systems. The theoretical part of the study substantiates the importance of personnel development as a strategic factor for improving the quality of medical services, managerial efficiency and public trust in state institutions. Comparative analysis demonstrates that in countries with well-developed health systems (Canada, Germany, Japan), public personnel management is implemented through the integration of state policy, professional development mechanisms and social guarantees. In particular, Japan is characterized by a multi-level system of workforce planning and centralized quality control; Germany combines public and private insurance with a high degree of social responsibility among health professionals; Canada features effective coordination between federal and provincial authorities and stable tax-based funding. By contrast, the US experience highlights the limitations of a private insurance model, which creates financial barriers for citizens and complicates the maintenance of a sustainable workforce. The results allow us to conclude that successful foreign practices for forming mechanisms of public personnel management rest on combining strategic state oversight, institutional support for continuous professional development, transparent financing systems and effective motivational tools. The proposed approach may be used to improve the Ukrainian health care system by aligning personnel management with European standards, ensuring workforce stability and enhancing the quality of public services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueПублічне управління і політика.Same topicLabor Market and EducationFrench-language works237,207