MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119751195 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_105792

Intervention‐related changes in variability of dynamic functional connectivity and the relationship to cognition in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease

2025· article· en· W7119751195 on OpenAlexaff
Paulina Skolasinska, Caitlin S. Walker, Adrián Noriega de la Colina, Alfie Wearn, Colleen Hughes, Roni Setton, Jillian Caplan, Laurence Côté, Kayla Williams, Sofia Ricciardelli, Linda Man-Kuen Li, Carolynn Boulanger, Nagashree Thovinakere, Garance Barnoin, Sarah Elbaz, Shania Fock Ka Bao, Ryan Kara, Nicolas Lavoie, Maggie Nguyen, Franciska Otaner, Helen Pallett‐Wiesel, Jacques Piché, Andreanne Powers, Christine Déry, Prantik Kundu, Ilana R. Leppert, Arthur F. Kramer, R. Nathan Spreng

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalAlzheimer Society of CanadaMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversity of TorontoMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionFunctional connectivityDiseaseIntervention (counseling)Temporal lobeAffect (linguistics)Default mode network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with a decline in specific cognitive abilities and increased variability of dynamic functional connectivity (v-dFC; Jauny et al., 2022), across the whole brain (Yang et al., 2023) and in the default network (Douw et al., 2016; Madhyastha & Grabowski, 2014). We investigated the extent to which age-related changes in v-dFC would be mitigated by an intervention to enhance physical activity in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and whether the changes in v-dFC were related to cognitive improvements. METHOD: =70.3 years) for a four-week randomized controlled trial. Multi-echo gradient-echo EPI sequence was used to acquire resting-state functional MRI data at baseline and post-intervention. Using Schaefer's 200 parcellation across Yeo's 17 networks, the dFC matrices were constructed with the Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives method (Shine et al., 2015; 10 TR overlapping windows). Modularity, system segregation (Chan et al., 2014), within-network and between-network FC of the DefaultA/B/C and ControlA/B/C networks were calculated for each dFC matrix. V-dFC was defined as the standard deviation of these measures. Group by time interactions effects on v-dFC were estimated after controlling for age, education, sex, motion and APOE4 carriership status. Change scores in v-dFC measures were correlated with changes in cognitive performance on digit span and digit symbol matching tasks. RESULT: The intervention group showed decreased modularity and maintained system segregation within-DefaultC, between DefaultC-ControlC v-dFC, compared to the control group who showed increased v-dFC (Figure 1) after the intervention period relative to baseline. The baseline to post-intervention decrease in v-dFC of modularity was related to concurrent improvement in digit symbol matching task performance (Figure 2). CONCLUSION: An intervention to enhance physical activity mitigated age-related increases in v-dFC network segregation and connectivity of the DefaultC subnetwork. DefaultC corresponds to the medial temporal lobe subsystem (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010), including the parahippocampal, retrosplenial and inferior parietal regions, which are highly vulnerable to AD pathology (Buckner et al., 2005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→