MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120092032 · doi:10.5284/1139007

Heritage Asset Impact Assessment: The Wellington Arms, 2 Woodford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire

2025· article· en· W7120092032 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ellen Shlasko

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionAsset (computer security)Real estateEstateQuarter (Canadian coin)Cultural heritage managementExcavationHousing estate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In January 2025, KDK Archaeology Ltd prepared a Heritage Asset Assessment of The Wellington Arms, 2 Woodford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire. The Wellington Arms was built c. 1870, and has been in continuous use as a public house and hotel. The proposed development calls for the demolition of the existing building and the erection of three-storey structure containing residential flats. The assessment was carried out according to the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists' Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Desk-Based Assessments with additional reference to Historic England Advice Note 12, Statements of Heritage Significance: Analysing Significance in Heritage Assets and Historic England Planning Note 3, The Setting of Heritage Assets. In January 2025, KDK Archaeology Ltd prepared a Heritage Asset Assessment of The Wellington Arms, 2 Woodford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire. The Wellington Arms was built c. 1870, and has been in continuous use as a public house and hotel. It is a typical Victorian pub and occupies a prominent position on a busy five-way road junction. This location, which is at the north end of the Estcourt Conservation Area, was part of the Clutterbuck estate and was used as agricultural land until the third quarter of the 19th century. In the decade following the opening of the Watford Junction railway station, this land, along with several other large estates, was sold for residential and commercial development. The proposed development calls for the demolition of the existing building and the erection of three-storey structure containing residential flats. The proposed design incorporates elements of the existing architecture, such as roof gables and a chamfered corner entrance to a commercial/retail space. Although The Wellington Arms is not a listed building, it makes a positive contribution to the surrounding Estcourt Conservation Area, however, it is in poor condition and many of its original details have been lost. An historic building recording would mitigate the impact of development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207