MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120092032 · doi:10.5284/1139007

Heritage Asset Impact Assessment: The Wellington Arms, 2 Woodford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire

2025· article· en· W7120092032 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ellen Shlasko

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionAsset (computer security)Real estateEstateQuarter (Canadian coin)Cultural heritage managementExcavationHousing estate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In January 2025, KDK Archaeology Ltd prepared a Heritage Asset Assessment of The Wellington Arms, 2 Woodford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire. The Wellington Arms was built c. 1870, and has been in continuous use as a public house and hotel. The proposed development calls for the demolition of the existing building and the erection of three-storey structure containing residential flats. The assessment was carried out according to the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists' Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Desk-Based Assessments with additional reference to Historic England Advice Note 12, Statements of Heritage Significance: Analysing Significance in Heritage Assets and Historic England Planning Note 3, The Setting of Heritage Assets. In January 2025, KDK Archaeology Ltd prepared a Heritage Asset Assessment of The Wellington Arms, 2 Woodford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire. The Wellington Arms was built c. 1870, and has been in continuous use as a public house and hotel. It is a typical Victorian pub and occupies a prominent position on a busy five-way road junction. This location, which is at the north end of the Estcourt Conservation Area, was part of the Clutterbuck estate and was used as agricultural land until the third quarter of the 19th century. In the decade following the opening of the Watford Junction railway station, this land, along with several other large estates, was sold for residential and commercial development. The proposed development calls for the demolition of the existing building and the erection of three-storey structure containing residential flats. The proposed design incorporates elements of the existing architecture, such as roof gables and a chamfered corner entrance to a commercial/retail space. Although The Wellington Arms is not a listed building, it makes a positive contribution to the surrounding Estcourt Conservation Area, however, it is in poor condition and many of its original details have been lost. An historic building recording would mitigate the impact of development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207