MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120301142

Alimentação saudável com adolescentes por meio de tecnologia da informação e comunicação: revisão de escopo

2023· dissertation· pt· W7120301142 on OpenAlex
Fellipe Bruno da Silva Oliveira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth Education and Validation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData extractionPsychological interventionLatin AmericansInclusion (mineral)Work (physics)Selection (genetic algorithm)SciELOSample (material)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adolescence is characterized by the period between 10 to 19 years of age. This is a phase for interventions related to the adoption of a healthy lifestyle, as well as its importance and impact on lifelong health. Educational technology in health becomes one of the alternatives to work with adolescents, as it enables interaction among them to promote healthy habits. Therefore, the present study aimed to map the national and international scientific production on healthy eating with adolescents, mediated by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). This is a scoping literature review, structured in the methodology recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR. Thus, the following steps were adopted: formulation of research questions, definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria, definition of the research strategy, selection of studies/evidence sources, data extraction and coding, analysis, and interpretation of results. The consulted databases were: Medline/Pubmed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, Embase, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The entire study selection process also occurred in duplicate, independently. The database search resulted in 12,990 works, after the application of initial filters and removal of duplicates, resulting in 7,898 documents. In the end, the sample resulted in 20 articles published in journals. It was possible to verify that most of the scientific production occurred internationally, with emphasis on studies conducted in the United States of America and Canada, with only one study conducted at the national level. In addition, the review showed that ICT are tools that can assist in promoting healthy habits, especially in the field of nutrition. Despite this, a critical view is necessary regarding the use of these technologies, especially regarding the content addressed. Thus, from this study, it is intended to contribute to the construction of knowledge regarding the use of ICT aimed at promoting healthy eating with adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it