Carga alostática e desempenho físico em idosos: análise transversal da coorte IMIAS - International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Allostatic Load (AL) reflects the cumulative impact of chronic stress on the body and is an important indicator of physiological adaptation to adversities throughout life. In older adults, AL is associated with increased vulnerability to chronic conditions, cognitive deficits, and depressive symptoms. Physical performance may also be linked to elevated AL levels, which can directly influence the quality of life and functional health of this population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between Allostatic Load (AL) and physical performance scores in older adults from four locations of the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS). METHODS: This thesis comprises a cross-sectional analytical study with data from 1,101 participants aged over 65 years from three countries (Canada, Brazil, and Colombia). Three multiple linear regression models were developed and adjusted for age, socioeconomic status (SES), chronic conditions, depressive symptomatology, and cognitive function to estimate the independent association between the AL index and physical performance, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores. Subsequently, a mediation analysis was conducted to examine the total, direct, and indirect effects of AL on the SPPB scores. RESULTS: In the four IMIAS study locations, AL was inversely associated with physical performance, where higher AL levels corresponded to lower SPPB scores (β: -0.234; Std: 0.033; p-value: <0.001). Indirect effects were observed between age, SES, and chronic conditions with AL and SPPB scores, while chronic conditions showed a total effect on SPPB scores mediated by AL. No significant indirect effects of depressive symptoms and cognitive deficits on SPPB scores were identified. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that increased AL levels are associated with poor physical performance in older adults across different socioeconomic aging profiles. AL plays a mediating role between chronic conditions, depressive symptoms, cognitive state, and physical performance, with socioeconomic status also influencing this relationship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".