Ecological Transition: A proposal based on the common, libertarian municipalism and abolitionist veganism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This doctoral thesis is based on a critique of the concept of Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a feasible solution to respond to the socioenvironmental crisis, pointing out the inconsistencies in the speeches inscribed in the SDG goals and the practical actions of the signatory countries of SDG.It discusses the relationship between the exploitation of fossil fuels -the energy matrix that sustains the current System -and its impacts on climate change and proposes, in order to avoid further damage to living conditions and the biosphere, the maintenance of oil reserves in the soil.It presents theoretical discussions pertinente to the field of studies on systemic transitions for sustainability, academic initiatives and transitionist social movements and the approaches underlying these discussions (sociotechnical, socio-institutional and socio-ecological).It proposes a new social configuration based on a sustainability that is simultaneously ecological, social and political and implemented through a proposal of transition to sustainable societies that brings utopia closer to another possible world -sustainable societies -to the present moment, through the exercise of a "utopia of now": the Ecological Municipalist Transition based on the Common (TEComun), on Murray Bookchin's Libertarian Municipalism and on abolitionist veganism, recognizing the sentience of non-human animals in all their experiments, initiatives and practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".