MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120562624

Metas, controle e neoliberalismo no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Ceará: uma análise a partir das noções de dispositivo e de biopoder

2025· dissertation· pt· W7120562624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stéfano Gonçalves Lima

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribunalNorm (philosophy)BiopowerWork (physics)Strategic planningOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Targets have become commonplace in contemporary work, a reality that can be observed in both the private and public sectors. But what is the rationale behind these practices? In view of this, it is important to understand how certain techniques adopted by the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Ceará (TJCE) work, such as strategic planning and the Gratificação por Alcance de Metas Estratégicas (GAM). It is also necessary to understand the way in which these techniques are present in the mentality of the members of this court. To this end, an analysis inspired by Michel Foucault's studies was made of the content and justifications of the strategic planning norms of the Conselho Nacional de Justiça (National Council of Justice) and the TJCE, the national goals of the Judiciary and the norms that instituted and regulate the GAM, with the aim of understanding them not only as an system, but as technologies of biopower that foster a norm standard. In addition, qualitative semi-structured interviews were carried out with members of the gold seal judicial courts in order to ascertain, through analysis of the recorded statements and the knowledge-power relations presupposed, how the processes of subjectivation, desubjectivation and resistance to the goals and logic of strategic management take place in the work environment of these units. Finally, the data collected was articulated with the bibliographic discussions of the critical paradigm to neoliberalism, focusing on Christian Laval, Pierre Dardot, Wendy Brown and Grégoire Chamayou, with the aim of understanding and verifying what knowledge and strategies guide the management process in these units. The final findings of the study were that the ultimate aim of management and targets is not for them to be achieved, but for a managed, efficient and proactive environment to be produced, with the incorporation of the norm standard. This process functions as a neoliberal judicial dispositif, in which biopower technologies are used to dispose of bodies and populations in the most efficient way, following a technocratic logic. It was also concluded that this dispositif is part of a broader context of neoliberal rationality, which promotes, among other phenomena, the emptying of the political dimension of democratic public life, the austere management of resources according to unequal networks of symbolic capital and a strategic exhaustion of available human resources, based on the logic of competition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207