MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7120574675

The relation between aging with hearing and cognition

2019· dissertation· pt· W7120574675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mirtes Brückmann

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDichotic listeningMismatch negativityCognitionHearing lossContingent negative variationAudiogramLatency (audio)Perception
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To analyze an aging relation with hearing and cognition. Still, as specific objectives, to analyze the influence of mild hearing loss, cognition and aging in the behavioral tests of Central Auditory Processing (CAP); todescribe and compare Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in elderly presenting normal hearing and hearing loss and correlate it with the cognitive and behavioral aspects of CAP in these groups and also, to generate normality values for MMN in the elderly; to analyze the characteristics of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP), P1, N1, P2, N2, P300 and MMN and their occurrence in aging. Method: Participated 54 elderly people aged between 60 and 77 years. Of these, 33 were normal-hearing and 21 presented mild hearing loss. Also participated 20 normal hearing adults, aged between 18 and 35 years. All performed anamnesis, basic audiological assessment, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Dichotic Digit Test (DDT), Speech in Noise test (SN) and the Randon Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and even the LLAEP elicited with verbal stimuli ba/ di for P1, N1, P2, N2 and P300 and with stimulation da/ ta for MMN, performed on SmartEP. The presence and absence of potentials was analyzed and, when present, the latency value of all potentials was analyzed, as well as the amplitude and duration of the P300 and MMN and the MMN area. Results: there was a significant difference between the elderly with and without hearing loss for DDT in the left ear (LE) and in the SN. The MoCA correlated with RGDT and DDT. The elderly had worse results in the CAP tests than adults. The LLAEPs were not affected by hearing loss. There was a correlation between the amplitude of the MMN with the RGDT and DDT and the altered DDT increased the duration of the MMN. The P2 latency was higher in the elderly and MMN latency was lower. The MMN showed more absences in the elderly. Conclusion: The mild hearing loss affected the responses of the SN test and the DDT, without influences on the RGDT, MoCA and LLAEP. Cognitive aspects correlated with RGDT and DDT, but not with MMN. The SN test was the only behavioral test that demonstrated only auditory results, without influences of cognition and aging was able to cause impairments in the CAP tests. The alteration in the CAP was able to cause longer durations in the MMN. It was possible to generate normality values for MMN in elderly people aged 60 to 77 years who are normal-hearing or present mild hearing loss, being the average latency value 199.8ms, amplitude 2.2μV, area 116.1μVms and duration 81.2ms. Among the LLAEP, P2 and MMN were more affected by aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicNeuroscience and Music Perception→French-language works237,207→