Houses and Memory: study on residential buildings in the Historic Center of Manaus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research proposes a critical and discursive analysis of heritage, memory, place, identity and culture and their interactions and articulations with three residential buildings located in the Historic Center of Manaus. The Historic Center of the city is the result of its historical process of formation, and that presents constructions, such as buildings, palaces, squares and monuments, with high architectural and urbanistic standards. In the Old Center it is possible to find residential buildings with the same characteristics of the period of their construction. Therefore, the analysis consists in understanding the dynamics of the historical, socioeconomic and cultural formation process, which is essential in the interpretation of these factors applied to the architectural and urban production of the city, and especially of these buildings. The discussions and notes of the conceptual and epistemological trajectory of the cultural heritage and its legal interactions in heritage management are included. As well as the conceptual discussion of Historic Center, and the characterization of the area where these houses are located. In addition, it sought to relate and critically discuss the eclectic model and the slope called Belle Époque that influenced and determined the urban and architectural improvements, implying the adoption of materials and construction techniques, as well as assimilation and cultural imposition of foreign values and customs. Relating these aspects in the production of these houses and their characteristics. And finally, the contribution of the narratives obtained through interviews with the owners of these houses, relating their memories and their experiences with the theoretical and conceptual approaches of memory and place. In addition to the interactions and contributions of the narratives of the interviewees and their families to the memory and identity of the city. The study also pointed out the management of heritage, its applicability and functionality, and the new perspectives for safeguarding the built heritage. It was sought, therefore, to highlight the relevance of these narratives in the memorial and identity contribution, in the historical and symbolic architecture of these buildings and their interdisciplinary interpretations in studies on heritage and culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".