MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120600735

No contexto da educação infantil : um olhar para as práticas pedagógicas de um CMEI

2018· dissertation· pt· W7120600735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jackeline Ferreira Sarmento

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarly childhood educationContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Qualitative researchState (computer science)Work (physics)Field (mathematics)Early childhood
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to analyze how the Sciences Education is present in the pedagogical practices of Early Childhood Education. The research was developed in the second quarter of 2017, with participants as teachers of a Centro Municipal de Educação Infantil (CMEI) in the eastern part of the city of Manaus. We divided the research into three moments: Historical context of how Child Education was constituted throughout the historical process in the State of Amazonas. In this sense, we present the chosen place for the research that is the result of this process. In the second moment, we present how the practices of Early Childhood Education are organized from the National Curricular Guidelines for Early Childhood Education and we present the work with projects, which are based on the pedagogical practices of the CMEI. In the third moment, we present what we understand by Science Education and how it is present in the pedagogical practices of the CMEI. The theoretical basis was based on authors like Miki (2017), Oliveira (2011) and Arce (2002), Brasil (2009), Larrosa (2011), Hernández (2008), Bachelard (1996) and Marques (2002). The methodological course was based on the qualitative approach and had as instruments of data collection, the questionnaire and the direct observation with record in field diary. Data were analyzed based on the interpretative analysis. The results indicate that the CMEI adopts in its pedagogical practices the work through projects, which seek to articulate the experiences from the proposed theme. It was verified that the teachers understand Science Education in aspects related to nature and the environment. However, we conclude that working with projects opens up many possibilities for developing Science Education in accordance with the idea defended here, which points to the interlocution of knowledge and complementarity between the sciences. Keywords: Early Childhood Education. Pedagogical practices. Science Education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicScience and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207