Os regimes de Welfare de Esping-Andersen e sua demonstração no cotidiano de EUA, Canadá, França, Inglaterra, Cuba e Irlanda - Uma análise de Sicko e Inside I'm dancing: Esping-Andersen's Welfare regimes and their demonstration in the daily lives of the USA, Canada, France, England, Cuba and Ireland - An analysis by Sicko and Inside I'm dancing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste artigo e apresentar as caracteristicas de atendimento de varias redes de protecao social em diversos paises (Canada, Reino Unido, Franca, Cuba, Irlanda e EUA) bem como urn comparativo, corn foco principal na atencao a satide e no bem-estar social que tais redes proporcionam. Tal analise e feita a partir de duas obras cinematograficas: um documentario e urn drama. 0 documentario trata-se do polemic° SOS Saude de Michael Moore, obra focada na critica de os EUA serem o imico pais do ocidente a Waco possuir um sistema de saúde universal. 0Odrama, por sua vez, trata-se do filme "Os melhores dias de nossas vidas" de Damien O'Donnel, que conta a historia de dois deficientes fisicos irlandeses e as dificuldades que enfrentam em seu dia-a-dia. A partir dos detalhes apresentados nestas obras e atraves de pesquisa a literatura sobre Estado de Bem-Estar Social faz-se entao uma exposicao destes modelos, bem como uma analise comparativa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".