Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desk-based research has been undertaken to inform the production of this SoS in line with the 2014 Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA) Standard and Guidance for Historic Environment Desk-Based Assessment (updated 2020). The following resources have been consulted during this research: � Relevant legislation, policy and guidance; � Relevant Guidance from Historic England and the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA); � The NHLE, the register of all nationally protected historic buildings and sites in England - listed buildings, scheduled monuments, protected wrecks, registered parks and gardens, and battlefields; � The local Historic Environment Record (HER) data, ordered from East Sussex Council Archaeological Services; � Historic cartographic information, as available online; and � Relevant published and unpublished historical sources, as available online and in The Keep Archive Centre in Brighton, which was visited on 12th of April 2022 (references provided throughout this SoS). Key Points of Significance � The castle and church set atop the outcrop sitting above the town is intrinsic to the visual landscape of the town; � The castle is associated with the Battle of Hastings, which is internationally significant, and other nationally significant events; � The church buildings have important surviving architectural details; and � If, upon excavation, Neolithic, Mesolithic and/or Iron Age evidence of settlement is found on Site, then it becomes a rare instance where the longevity of occupation of a place, spanning millennia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it