MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7123244630 · doi:10.5284/1139043

Hastings Castle Statement of Significance

2022· article· en· W7123244630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Niamh Carty

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLandscape and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)BattleHuman settlementQuarter (Canadian coin)Documentary evidenceChronologyJudgement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desk-based research has been undertaken to inform the production of this SoS in line with the 2014 Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA) Standard and Guidance for Historic Environment Desk-Based Assessment (updated 2020). The following resources have been consulted during this research: � Relevant legislation, policy and guidance; � Relevant Guidance from Historic England and the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA); � The NHLE, the register of all nationally protected historic buildings and sites in England - listed buildings, scheduled monuments, protected wrecks, registered parks and gardens, and battlefields; � The local Historic Environment Record (HER) data, ordered from East Sussex Council Archaeological Services; � Historic cartographic information, as available online; and � Relevant published and unpublished historical sources, as available online and in The Keep Archive Centre in Brighton, which was visited on 12th of April 2022 (references provided throughout this SoS). Key Points of Significance � The castle and church set atop the outcrop sitting above the town is intrinsic to the visual landscape of the town; � The castle is associated with the Battle of Hastings, which is internationally significant, and other nationally significant events; � The church buildings have important surviving architectural details; and � If, upon excavation, Neolithic, Mesolithic and/or Iron Age evidence of settlement is found on Site, then it becomes a rare instance where the longevity of occupation of a place, spanning millennia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3590.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicLandscape and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207