DistillSort: Distilling Autoencoders for Efficient Spike Sorting in Intracortical Brain—Computer Interfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As intracortical brain—computer interfaces (BCIs) scale to thousands of channels, separating overlapping neural spikes in real time becomes increasingly challenging under strict power and memory budgets. Deep autoencoders have recently emerged as powerful feature extractors for spike sorting, yet their large parameter counts and high inference costs preclude deployment on implantable devices. This work introduces DistillSort, a spike-sorting pipeline that compresses autoencoder-based feature extractors through knowledge distillation. A deep teacher autoencoder is trained on neural waveforms, and a shallow student is distilled to match both its latent codes and reconstructions via a weighted combination of self-reconstruction, code-distillation, and reconstruction-distillation losses. The distilled student produces latent representations that closely approximate those of the teacher while containing only half of the teacher's parameters and requiring$2.3 \times$fewer multiply-accumulate operations. On real multichannel neural recordings, the distilled model maintained the deep autoencoder's clustering quality and was consistently superior to a shallow autoencoder trained without distillation. Inference latency is reduced from$97.0 \mu ~\mathrm{s}$to$60.1 \mu ~\mathrm{s}$. These results demonstrate that knowledge distillation enables efficient and deployable neural feature extraction for spike sorting in BCIs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".