Overview of the Lunch Menu in the Play Group (KB) of Darul Hikam Kindergarten, Cirebon City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. A full-day school is an educational system whose learning runs from morning to evening, or over one day. In Indonesia, schools that implement the lunch program are still relatively few, accounting for 0.16% in 2016. School feeding is enforced to meet students' macro- and micronutrient needs, so that later it can improve students' intake and nutritional status. However, implementing the school lunch program faces several obstacles. This is due to the poor quality of the menu and the lack of variety, so students do not have the opportunity to choose their food. Play Group (Kb), Tk Darul Hikam Cirebon, is one of the full-day schools that provides lunch. Aims. The purpose of this study is to find out the description of the lunch menu in the Play Group (Kb) of Tk Darul Hikam Cirebon. Methods. This study uses Descriptive Observational. The data collected are both primary and secondary. Primary data includes setting menu patterns, portion standards, menu cycles, and menu arrangement using Checklist Sheets. Secondary data on the general picture in the Play Group (KB) at Darul Hikam Kindergarten in Cirebon City were obtained from the principal. Result. The research results of the Play Group (KB) at Darul Hikam Cirebon Kindergarten have established a menu pattern comprising carbohydrate dishes, animal side dishes, navati side dishes, and fruits. The Play Group (KB) of Darul Hikam Cirebon Kindergarten does not have a standard portion except for animal side dishes and selinagan. The menu cycle is 5 days, and the lunch menu is arranged in accordance with the principles of balanced nutrition. Conclusions. The Play Group (KB) of Darul Hikam Cirebon Kindergarten does not have a standard portion except for animal side dishes and selinagan Involvement. The menu cycle is 5 days, and the lunch menu is arranged in accordance with the principles of balanced nutrition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".