MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

LMU-EEG: A Legendre Memory Unit Framework for Accurate Seizure Detection from EEG Signals

2025· article· W7124166801 on OpenAlexaff
Danial Baharlouei, Alireza Ahrar, Maher Assaad, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi, Amirali Amirsoleimani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersAjman University
KeywordsElectroencephalographyPattern recognition (psychology)Representation (politics)Pipeline (software)Legendre polynomialsFeature (linguistics)Sensitivity (control systems)Time domain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an energy-efficient seizure detection framework leveraging Legendre Memory Unit (LMU)based models, designed to address the challenges of long-range temporal modeling in EEG time-series data. LMUs offer a hardware-friendly alternative to conventional recurrent architectures by employing a fixed, linear time-invariant (LTI) memory system based on orthogonal Legendre polynomials, enabling precise temporal representation with minimal computational overhead. Our pipeline integrates signal preprocessing, frequency domain feature extraction, Random Forest-based EEG channel selection, class balancing via SMOTE, and LMU-based classification. Evaluated on the CHB-MIT Scalp EEG dataset, the proposed system achieves high sensitivity (average 97.26%) and low false detection rates (average $\mathbf{0. 0 3 2 9}$) across multiple subjects. These results demonstrate that LMUs not only outperform traditional models like LSTMs in detection accuracy and temporal capacity, but also maintain advantages critical for real-time, lowpower neurotechnologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→