MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124173118 · doi:10.29302/jolie.2022.15.2.3

THE “MULTICULTURAL” PHENOMENON INHERENT IN WILLIAM KURELEK’S CREATIVE METHOD: RESEARCH AND RESULTS

2022· article· W7124173118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Khrystyna Beregovska, Ivanna Pavelchuk, Andrii Tarasenko, Halyna Stelmashchuk, Valentyna Kostiukova

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismPaintingStyle (visual arts)ImmigrationPhenomenonThe Renaissance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyses the uniqueness of the creative multiculturalism employed by the Canadian-Ukrainian artist William Kurelek. In the works of Kurelek, a synthetic approach is traced, based on a long-term analysis of the historical context, socio-cultural environment and futuristic forecasts. His comparative worldview arose not only as a result of observations, but is also visible through the ideas reflected in his works. Based on its artistic analysis of Kurelek’s works, this article studies the development of Kurelek’s authorial technique — which he described as “mixed” for good reason, due to his experimental application of a plethora of artistic methods in his works. The artist’s enhanced his synthesis of stylistic features from both the renaissance and modernist repertoire by means of fiction and his own writing practices. Due to Kurelek’s childhood experience, his immigrant grandparents, and later, his own experience of his “dual” identity, it was very important for the artist to record in his paintings the presence and contributions of each immigrant group comprising Canada’s multicultural society. Kurelek’s authorial style consists of several components: 1) the uniqueness of the author’s artistic technique obtained through long-term experiments based on his artistic training (at professional schools, from the teachings of Nicolaides, and self-education); 2) the synthesis of analysed stylistic techniques, the main features of which Kurelek transformed using his own distinct artistic and compositional language; 3) the idea of painting chronicles that documented the driving processes behind immigration to Canadian, as well as the relations between immigrants and representatives of the First Nations (the Eskimo and the Huron); 4) the consistency and “moral loyalty” in Kurelek’s choice of topical social issues for the content of his paintings; 5) the artist’s literary explorations in terms of his illustrations for poems and fictional essays. The first feature of Kurelek’s style is his unique mixed painting technique, the “recipe” of which he developed during different periods of his career. Kurelek’s arsenal of expressive artistic media included: oil, acrylic, pastel, pencil, pen, sprays, lacquers, and wax. The artist not only painted with a brush; he also scratched, carved, and sanded his works. It was not interesting for Kurelek to show the simple fact of immigrants’ existence in Canada — rather, he always sought to convey the cause and effect, as well as the interactions between and national differences of each group. The artist had to create with unlimited freedom, and find everything necessary to do so from the depths of his inner world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Linguistic and Intercultural EducationSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207