Protest and the Power of Cultural Practice : Storytelling, Art, Language and Education Across Three First Nations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay explores ways in which the cultural practices of storytelling, ceremonial performance, visual arts, language revitalisation, and Indigenous-led schooling function as political assertions of identity and resistance across Indigenous societies globally, focusing on three case studies: the Māori of Aotearoa/New Zealand, First Nations in Canada, and Aboriginal peoples of Australia.While much scholarship centres on political or legal activism, this essay repositions cultural practice as an equally significant site of Indigenous survival and decolonial resistance.Drawing on Indigenous methodologies and a critical intercultural framework, this study critiques a recurring scholarly tendency to portray Indigenous cultural practices as static or apolitical.It demonstrates instead how these nations mobilise cultural expression to challenge settler-colonial authority, protect land, and assert their own forms of governance.Based on interviews, literature review, and comparative analysis, this essay argues that cultural resistance is dynamic, embodied, and highly political rather than reductive or confined to static notions of "tradition" that obscure the lived experiences of Indigenous resurgence.The study aligns with current decolonial scholarship by illustrating how cultural resurgence reshapes understandings of the relationship among knowledge, power, and identity. SammanfattningDetta arbete undersöker hur kulturella praktiker såsom berättande, ceremoniella framträdanden, visuella konstformer, språkrevitalisering och urfolksledda skolformer fungerar som politiska uttryck för identitet och motstånd inom urfolkssamhällen globalt, med fokus på tre fallstudier: Māori i Aotearoa/Nya Zeeland, First Nations i Kanada och Aboriginska folk i Australien.Även om mycket forskning undersöker juridisk eller politisk aktivism, fokuserar denna uppsats på kulturell praktik som ett lika betydelsefullt uttryck för urfolks överlevnad och dekolonialt motstånd.Med utgångspunkt i urfolksmetodologier och ett kritiskt interkulturellt ramverk kritiserar studien en kvarlevande tendens inom forskningen att framställa urfolks kulturella praktiker som statiska eller opolitiska.Den visar istället hur dessa nationer mobiliserar kulturella uttryck för att utmana en bosättarkolonial maktordning, skydda land och hävda sina egna former av självstyre.Baserat på intervjuer, litteraturgenomgång och jämförande analys argumenterar uppsatsen för att kulturellt 4 motstånd är dynamiskt, förkroppsligat och politiskt, snarare än reduktionistiskt eller bundet till föreställningar om statisk "tradition" som osynliggör erfarenheterna av urfolkens resurgens.Studien bidrar till den dekoloniala forskningen genom att belysa hur kulturell resurgens omformar förståelser av relationen mellan kunskap, makt och identitet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".