Kualitas Ruang Ramah Anak di Kawasan Permukiman Padat Kelurahan Giwangan, Kota Yogyakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. A Rapid urbanization in Indonesian cities has reduced the availability of safe and inclusive public spaces for children, particularly in dense residential areas. Although the Child-Friendly City policy has been implemented, its application at the neighborhood scale remains uneven. This study aims to evaluate the quality of a child-friendly neighborhood in Giwangan Urban Village, Yogyakarta City, as a representation of dense urban settlements. The research adopts a Child-Friendly Urban Planning approach combined with the concept of the right to the city. A qualitative descriptive method was employed through field observations and short interviews, using an evaluation instrument consisting of 30 indicators grouped into five categories: play spaces, safety, children’s activities, parental and community roles, and digital access and policy support. The findings indicate that 22 out of 30 indicators were fulfilled, resulting in an achievement rate of 73.33%, which is classified as high quality. While basic physical facilities are generally available, significant limitations persist in children’s mobility, inclusivity, participation, and the effectiveness of local programs and policies. This study contributes a neighborhood-scale evaluation framework for child-friendly environments and highlights the importance of incorporating children’s lived experiences in assessing urban space quality. Abstrak. Pesatnya urbanisasi di kota-kota Indonesia berimplikasi pada berkurangnya ruang publik yang aman dan inklusif bagi anak, terutama di kawasan permukiman padat. Meskipun kebijakan Kota Layak Anak telah diterapkan, implementasinya pada skala lingkungan permukiman masih menunjukkan kesenjangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kualitas kawasan ramah anak di Kelurahan Giwangan, Kota Yogyakarta, sebagai representasi kawasan permukiman padat perkotaan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Child-Friendly Urban Planning yang dipadukan dengan konsep right to the city. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif melalui observasi lapangan dan wawancara singkat, dengan instrumen evaluasi berupa 30 indikator yang dikelompokkan ke dalam lima kategori, yaitu ruang bermain, keamanan, aktivitas anak, peran orang tua dan komunitas, serta akses digital dan kebijakan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 22 dari 30 indikator terpenuhi, dengan tingkat pemenuhan sebesar 73,33% yang dikategorikan sebagai kualitas tinggi. Temuan mengungkap bahwa ketersediaan fasilitas fisik dasar relatif memadai, namun masih terdapat kelemahan pada aspek mobilitas anak, inklusivitas, partisipasi, serta dukungan program dan kebijakan di tingkat lokal. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi berupa kerangka evaluasi kawasan ramah anak pada skala lingkungan permukiman serta menunjukkan pentingnya pendekatan berbasis pengalaman anak dalam menilai kualitas ruang kota.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".