MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124317972 · doi:10.28978/nesciences.1811172

Smart Environmental Engineering for Sustainable Aquatic Resource Management Using IoT Sensors, Satellite Data Fusion, and Machine Learning Analytics

2025· article· W7124317972 on OpenAlexaff
Raenu Kolandaisamy, Melam Thirupathaiah, Rinku Sharma Dixit, Shailee Lohmor Choudhary, Anusha Sreeram, Nimesh Raj, Dr.D. Neelamegam

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural and Engineering Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityMultispectral imageSensor fusionAnalyticsEnvironmental monitoringArtificial neural networkResource management (computing)Convolutional neural networkBig dataWireless sensor network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adequate management of the aquatic system which includes rivers, lakes, reservoirs, wetlands, and coastal areas will need the continuous and high-resolution monitoring of the environment that will be able to handle the fast hydrological and ecological shifts. Conventional field methods of sampling offer poor spatial and temporal resolution, and they frequently do not reveal early pollution incidences, predict ecological hazards, or assist data-driven resources optimization. This paper will introduce an interdisciplinary smart environmental engineering paradigm that will combine Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, multispectral and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite remote sensing, and machine learning (ML) analytics to allow real-time, predictive, and adaptive management of aquatic resources. In the given methodology, a hierarchical data fusion architecture is used to bring the high-frequency measurements of the in-situ sensors in harmony with the big data measurements of the satellites to improve the spatial-temporal resolution and interpretability of the environment. Various ML architectures, such as the Random Forest (classification), LSTM (time-series prediction), CNN-based spatial models (detecting the harmful algae bloom), and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) (making predictions based on hydrodynamics) were tested to determine their efficiency involved in the forecasting of water quality parameters, assessing the pollution sources, and defining the habitat health. A pilot application of the integrated system in an actual freshwater lake showed that the integrated system is more effective at the prediction accuracy level (27 percent improvement), spatial mapping reliability, and a shorter (41 percent less) time to detect contaminants than traditional monitoring approaches. The results indicate the potential of integrating IoT with satellites and machine learning to enable a flexible, robust, and smart system of monitoring that can ultimately contribute to the active management of the environment, reinforce the methods of climate change adaptation, and help to achieve the sustainable preservation of water resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural and Engineering SciencesSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207