Pengetahuan Sikap Terhadap Perilaku Personal Hygiene Pada Remaja Putri Di Bandarjo Ungaran Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upaya peningkatan kesehatan diri pada remaja putri dapat dilakukan melalui tindakan preventif dengan cuci tangan. Kegiatan ini efektif menghambat pertumbuhan bakteri jika dilakukan secara benar sesuai kebijakan dari WHO yaitu mencuci tangan 6 langkah selama 20-30 detik. Akan tetapi prevalensi keputihan pada remaja putri terus meningkat. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui pengetahuan dan sikap terhadap personal hygiene pada remaja. Metode: deskriptif kuantitatif dengan pendekatan crossectional, teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan simple random sampling yang diperoleh respnden 68 remaja putri. Analisa univariat menggunakan deskriptif yang disajikan dalam frekuensi dan presentase, bivariat menggunakan chi square. Simpulan: sebagain besar responden memiliki pengetahuan cukup sebanyak 38,2%, sedangkan responden bersikap negative sebesar 64,7%, perilaku negative 54,4%, sehingga terdapat hubungan pengetahuan dan sikap terhadap perilaku personal hygiene dengan p value 0,0000,05, rasio odds 2,632 pada pengetahuan artinya pengetahuan memiliki pengaruh lebih kuat dari sikap. Oleh karena itu, diharapkan ada upaya berkelanjutan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman melalui program edukasi berkelanjutan tentang personal hygiene pada remaja putri sehingga dapat membentuk perilaku yang mandiri untuk meningkatkan kesehatan diri melalui upaya sederhana yang efektif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".