Театральна антреприза в Україні останньої чверті ХІХ століття: культуротворчий аспект
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose of the article. By addressing certain pages in the history of Kharkiv’s theatrical life in the last quarter of the 19th century – particularly facts confirming the significance of reforms introduced by members of one of the most renowned families of theatrical patrons and enthusiasts, the Dyukov family – the proposed material aims to reveal the most illustrative phenomena observed in Kharkiv’s theatrical and cultural life, which undoubtedly formed an important component of the development of Ukrainian theatre during this period across the territory of Ukraine. Research methodology is based on the use and combination of historical-reconstructive, analytical, and descriptive methods. Scientific novelty of the research lies in the disclosure of previously unknown or entirely unexplored facts of Ukraine’s theatrical culture of the past, which, in our view, is among the highest priorities of contemporary theatre studies. The processing of many artefacts for a wider scholarly audience enriches and diversifies the overall picture of the development of Ukraine’s theatrical culture in the last quarter of the 19th century, and at times even compels a shift in emphasis concerning phenomena or figures who spearheaded artistic processes. Conclusions state that numerous factors contributed to the formation and advancement of the city’s general culture, among them the tours of foreign performers; within the context of forming national consciousness under the Russian Empire, the article emphasizes the significance of repeated performances in various Kharkiv venues by Ukrainian troupes featuring M. L. Kropyvnytskyi, M. K. Sadovskyi, and M. K. Zankovetska; it also highlights the important role of the press in shaping and developing Kharkiv’s theatrical culture, particularly through its independent and unbiased analyses of diverse events and phenomena, which distinguishes the contributions of its representatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".