MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7124744847 · doi:10.7302/28128

Convergent Adaptive Strategies During the Transitional Holocene: A Case Study from the Alpena-Amberley Ridge in the Great Lakes Region

2025· dissertation· en· W7124744847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brendan Nash

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandformRidgeContext (archaeology)ForagingLand bridgeStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pleistocene-Holocene Transition (PHT) (13,000–8,000 years ago) was a period of pronounced climatic and landscape change that affected every continent. Along with retreating glaciers, rising sea levels produced dramatic effects on landscapes around the world. In response, foraging groups from different portions of the globe developed convergent adaptive strategies, including miniaturized stone tool industries, niche construction, increased mobility, and far-reaching social networks. This dissertation investigates the global phenomenon of convergent adaptive strategies during the PHT through a case study from the Alpena-Amberley Ridge (AAR). The AAR is a limestone and dolomite landform that crosses the Lake Huron Basin from northwest to southeast, forming a causeway that connects both sides. The landform served as a land bridge that caribou likely used on seasonal migration routes and that ancient foragers used for seasonal hunting. The AAR is currently underwater and was only traversable, dry land during the Lake Stanley lowstand between about 11,000 and 8,000 years ago. The submerged context of the AAR has preserved archaeological data, including organic remains and landscape modifications such as hunting blinds and drive lines, from disturbance by modern development. This makes it an ideal location for investigating hunter-gatherer adaptations to new and changing conditions at the onset of the Holocene. The results of this investigation show that foraging strategies on the AAR resemble global patterns but also exhibit unique expressions strongly influenced by the local environment. These adaptations most closely resemble those documented from northern post-Arctic landscapes in western Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology→French-language works237,207→