Bibliographic record
Abstract
In their article ‘Golden Figures from Tell el-Farkha’ from 2007, Marek Chłodnicki and Krzysztof Ciałowicz discuss the two golden statues found at Tell el-Farkha and compare them, among others, to a golden statue bought in 1907 or shortly thereafter by C.T. Currelly (today in the Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto). To better understand the provenance of this statue which was bought in the vicinity of Luxor, a search of C.T. Currelly’s documentation and autobiography was undertaken as well as the correspondence of W.M.F. Petrie and J. Quibell. Based on the nature of the statue and the location of the aquisition, Nubt (Petrie’s Naqada site, and De Morgan’s Toukh site) seems to be a very likely candidate for the site at which this statue may have been found. More or less concurrent with C.T. Currelly’s acquisition of the golden statue, museum records (Egyptian Museum Cairo, and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston) indicate that either through building activities or illegal excavations, numerous objects flowed into the antiquities markets of Luxor and Qena, seemingly coming from Nubt. The archaeological history of the Naqada Region from 1901 to about 1910 is discussed to better understand the context of these objects, and to provide a foil for understanding the golden statue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".