MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124884604 · doi:10.58739/jcbs/v15i4.24.219

Therapeutic Potential of Banana Pseudo- Stem Extracts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antioxidant, Anti- Inflammatory, Antimicrobial, and Anti- Urolithiatic Properties with Risk of Bias Assessment

2025· article· en· W7124884604 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Govindan Nandini Devi, Sangeetha S, Arbind Kumar Choudhary, Panneerselvam Periasamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBanana Cultivation and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyMeta-analysisAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialMEDLINEClinical trialAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Banana pseudo-stem, a farming waste, may contain bioactive compounds with therapeutic properties. Due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and anti-urolithiatic properties, banana pseudo-stem extracts may help manage chronic diseases, infections, and kidney stones, according to recent research A complete synthesis of research must evaluate banana pseudo-stem extract efficacy and safety. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis analyse banana pseudo-stem extracts' antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and anti-urolithiatic properties. A risk of bias evaluation will evaluate the evidence's quality and reliability. Method: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for banana pseudo-stem extract medical studies. Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and preclinical animal studies qualify. Two independent reviewers will examine publications, extract data, and assess bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Pooled effect sizes will be derived from quantitative data using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses will use extraction, dosage, and study population. We will use the I² statistic to quantify heterogeneity and conduct sensitivity experiments as appropriate. Result: Antioxidant capacity, inflammatory marker lowering, antibacterial capabilities, and anti-urolithiatic potential (e.g., urinary oxalate and crystal count) are key outcomes. Secondary outcomes of banana pseudo-stem extract treatment include safety, adverse events, and quality of life. Conclusion: This review will synthesise banana pseudo-stem extracts' therapeutic effects for future study and clinical use. Research will promote banana pseudo-stem as a plant-based therapy and identify gaps. Keywords: Banana pseudo-stem, Therapeutic potential, Antioxidant activity, Anti-inflammatory effects, Antimicrobial properties, Anti-urolithiatic effects, Bioactive compounds, Herbal medicine, Chronic disease management, Sustainable healthcare, Traditional remedies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCESSame topicBanana Cultivation and ResearchFrench-language works237,207