MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125093070

Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six b quarks using pp collisions at (Formula presented) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

2025· article· en· W7125093070 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nuno Filipe Castro, A. Onofre, ATLAS Collaboration

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesCERNTRIUMF
KeywordsHiggs bosonBranching fractionPseudoscalarBosonLarge Hadron ColliderScalar (mathematics)Atlas (anatomy)Standard Model (mathematical formulation)Atlas detector
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson \( H \) into new scalar or pseudoscalar particles that subsequently decay into \( b \)-quarks is presented. The search considers \( Z H \) production with several decay scenarios for the Higgs boson; first to a pair of identical scalars, \( H \rightarrow 2a \rightarrow 4b \), second to a pair of scalars with different masses (\( m_{a1} < m_{a2} \)), either directly, \( H \rightarrow a_1 a_2 \rightarrow 4b \), or via a longer decay chain, \( H \rightarrow a_1 a_2 \rightarrow 3a_1 \rightarrow 6b \). The analysis uses proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} = 13 \text{ TeV} \) collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of \( 140 \text{ fb}^{-1} \). No significant excess above the Standard Model prediction is observed. The search sets upper limits at 95% confidence level on the ratio of the Higgs boson production cross section to the SM prediction times the branching ratio of Higgs bosons decaying into \( 4b \) or \( 6b \), between 4% and 25% for \( \sigma(ZH)/\sigma_{SM}(ZH) \times \mathcal{B}(H \rightarrow 2a \rightarrow 4b) \), between 24% and 38% for \( \sigma(ZH)/\sigma_{SM}(ZH) \times \mathcal{B}(H \rightarrow a_1 a_2 \rightarrow 4b) \), and between 10% and 20% for \( \sigma(ZH)/\sigma_{SM}(ZH) \times \mathcal{B}(H \rightarrow a_1 a_2 \rightarrow 3a_1 \rightarrow 6b) \), depending on the masses of the scalar particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207