MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125096378 · doi:10.18280/mmep.121223

The Spread of African Swine Fever (ASF) in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia, Analyzed Using a Mathematical Modeling Approach

2025· article· W7125096378 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ariyanto, Maria Vitória Marialva da Silva LÔBO, Farly Oktriany Haning, Keristina Br Ginting, Jusrry Rosalina Pahnael, Elisabet Tangkonda

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAfrican swine feverDisease transmissionLivestockAnimal productionAnimal health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious viral disease that results in very high mortality rates among pigs and causes significant economic losses worldwide.In Indonesia, ASF has spread to 32 provinces since the first outbreak in 2019, with East Nusa Tenggara being one of the most severely affected areas.This study developed a nonlinear differential equation model to analyze the dynamics of ASF transmission and evaluate the combined effectiveness of biosecurity measures and vector control strategies in controlling the disease's spread.The model calculates the basic reproductive number both without and with vectors.An integrated approach that combines biosecurity measures and optimal vector control can significantly reduce the risk of infection, depending on the effectiveness of biosecurity (p) and the effectiveness of tick vector control (q).These findings suggest that the synergistic approach of combining biosecurity and optimal vector control is highly effective in reducing the spread of ASF in East Nusa Tenggara.This provides a scientific foundation for developing adaptive disease control policies in Indonesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207