Research on the Path to Realize Brand Value from the Perspective of Consumers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brand is an inescapable topic in daily life, big to real estate, school, small to fast food, home appliances... Many well-known brands are constantly exporting their own cultural values and brand culture in various ways of communication, in order to build a worldwide vision and integration, it can be said that the cultural communication of the brand has an important value and role in the long-term development of the enterprise, but also its "invisible link" to bind consumers. This paper discusses the cultural significance of brand in the modern market, the path to realize its value, the relationship between brand and consumers, analyzes the formation and development of brand culture, reveals how brands establish emotional connection with consumers through cultural elements, and the formation mechanism of brand identity and brand loyalty. Combined with practical cases, this paper studies the realization path of brand value, shows how successful brands realize their value through marketing and product innovation, and introduces the concept of "invisible link" to explore how brands influence consumer behavior and bind consumers through subtle ways. Since the beginning of the 21st century, more and more domestic enterprises have begun to pay attention to brand culture and value realization, which also faces challenges and opportunities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".