MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125268852 · doi:10.18280/rcma.350607

Static Behavior of 3D Printed Sandwich Beam with Spherical Core for Aircraft Structure

2025· article· W7125268852 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rand K. Abdulhussien, Assad D. Abdulsahib, Marwah Ghazi Kareem, Sadiq E. Sadiq, Luay S. Al-Ansari

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicCellular and Composite Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywords3d printedCore (optical fiber)Beam (structure)3D printingFused deposition modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical response of sandwich structures is strongly governed by the geometry of their core; however, spherical core configurations have received limited attention due to fabrication constraints associated with conventional manufacturing techniques.In this study, additive manufacturing (AM) is utilized to introduce and investigate a novel spherical-core sandwich beam designed for lightweight structural applications.The static bending behavior of cantilever sandwich beams subjected to transverse loading is examined through a combined numerical and experimental approach.Finite element simulations were performed using ANSYS Workbench 2023, covering 72 parametric cases to assess the influence of sphere radius, center-to-center spacing distance, and face sheet thickness on static deflection, von Mises stress, and strain energy.Experimental validation was conducted by fabricating and testing eight specimens using 3D printing technology.The numerical predictions show good agreement with the experimental deflection results, with deviations within an acceptable range.The results reveal that increasing the sphere radius and face sheet thickness enhances the bending stiffness and reduces deformation, stress, and strain energy, while increasing the spacing distance leads to a noticeable deterioration in structural performance.These findings confirm the potential of spherical-core sandwich beams as an effective alternative core configuration for achieving high stiffness-to-weight efficiency under static bending loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicCellular and Composite StructuresFrench-language works237,207