Catherine Collobert (dir.), L’avenir de la philosophie est-il grec ?, Saint-Laurent (Québec), Fides, 2002, coll. « Noesis », 240 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la ligne d'un certain nombre de philosophes du XX e sicle comme Brentano ou Moore, Hurka dfinit la vertu comme un bien intrinsque, mme si son effet positif dpend aussi du bien et du mal extrieur l'individu.Mme s'il affirme dans sa prface que peu d'ides philosophiques sont nouvelles, et c'est certainement vrai des ides de ce livre (p.VII), 1'ouvrage de Hurka est remarquablement original par la manire dont il dfinit la vertu, recourant parfois un formalisme logique et mathmatique.L'auteur se dmarque clairement de l'thique de la vertu dans la tradition aristotlicienne. son avis, les vertus peuvent s'intgrer aussi bien dans une vision consquentialiste que dans une vision dontologique.Il propose mme une conception intermdiaire de la vertu entre, d'une part, ces deux visions, pour lesquelles la notion de vertu a un rle secondaire , et, d'autre part, l'thique de la vertu qui lui donne un rle prpondrant. Le but de ce livre est de dvelopper un statut de la vertu intermdiaire entre ces extrmes (p.3).Du fait de son caractre ardu, le livre s'adresse principalement aux spcialistes.Georges CHAPOUTHIER.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".