Manajemen Pelayanan Kemanusiaan Merespon Fenomena Masalah Sosial Perlakuan Salah terhadap Anak (PSTA)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Case of mistreatment for children (PSTA) are still found in Semarang regency. There are neglected children who engange in social deviant behaviour caused social dysfunction. The research aims to knew factors social problem mistreatment for children (PSTA) in Watuagung village, do it implementation human service management for children with near strategic education. This research used qualitative method analyze descriptive nearing case studied, research sample is children with name NN and local people, data collection techniques through with snowball sample with observation, interview, documentary and participatory, data analyze used triangulation of data validity. Results for this research showed are still family doing PSTA because economy poverty and citizen haved discriminative culture with PSTA victim and didn’t intervention from goverment, institution, or social activist to cleared social problem phenomena. Of this is influenced by less responsive from goverment with case PSTA and the need for regular assistance for families who carry out PSTA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it