MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125423933 · doi:10.3917/rphi.031.0103m

Jean-Luc Gouin, Hegel ou De la raison intégrale, suivi de « Aimer penser mourir », Hegel, Nietzsche, Freud en miroirs, Préface de Jacques Dufresne, Saint-Laurent (Québec), Bellarmin, 1999, 224 p.

2003· article· fr· W7125423933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue philosophique de la France et de l étranger · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHume's philosophy and hair distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Subject (documents)Identity (music)Perspective (graphical)Relation (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Francis Bacon : réforme de l’État ou réforme de la société ? Bacon fait partie de ces rares penseurs qui ont eu des responsabilités politiques à la hauteur de leur ambition intellectuelle. Ce n’est pas pour autant que la réforme du savoir qu’il propose aurait pour but essentiel, comme une grande partie de la critique baconienne le suggère, de mettre les sciences au service de la grandeur de l’Angleterre et, d’une façon plus générale, de la volonté de puissance de l’État absolu à l’âge classique. Bien au contraire, pour Bacon, c’est l’État lui-même qui doit servir l’augmentation et le rayonnement des sciences en vue de refonder l’empire du savoir que l’humanisme du siècle précédent n’avait su maintenir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it