Vsebnost rutina v ajdi (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn. in F. cymosum Meissn.) pridelani na Daljnem vzhodu Rusije
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents results of the complex research of different species of Fagopyrum (F. esculentum Moench, F. tataricum (L.) Gaertn., F. cymosum Meissn.) on rutin content and their usage prospects as a resource of flavonoids. Relation between rutin content in the overground mass and the plant colour was found. Biological significance of rutin, prospects of its usage as a diagnostic trait in selection, are also shown in the article. Bio-chemical and technological traits of F. esculentum varieties cultivated in the Far East Russia were also studied and reflected in the paper. We therefore examined rutin content in the overground phytomass of the three species of Fagopyrum on the phase of mass flowering and discovered that high indices belong to: F. esculentum (Izumrud variety) ‒ 3.8 %, F. tataricum (sample k-62 from Canada) ‒ 4.4 % and F. cymosum (k-4231 from India) ‒ 4.1 %. Rutin content in the hull of common buckwheat ranged from 0.08 till 0.20 %. Maximum rutin quantity was determined in the hull of Ussurochka (35.7 kg/ha), and minimum (17.8 kg/ha) in the hull of Pri 7. The studies show that the ash content, obtained after burning the hull of F. esculentum (600°C) is in average 2 %. The following elements were found in the ash: potassium, sodium, copper, silver, calcium, magnesium, zinc, aluminum, manganese, iron, nickel, chromium, phosphorus, and their concentration depend on variety and type of raw material of F. esculentum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".