Seeking Kairos: Creating Oases of Rest through Contemplative Practice in the Elementary Classroom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seeking Kairos: Creating Oases of Rest through Contemplative Practice in the Elementary Classroom This article introduces rest and restfulness as contemplative practice in the context of elementary schooling. As a Canadian elementary teacher, I have been researching ways to introduce contemplative practices of education to support children in their well-being. Children struggle under the pressures of expectations to achieve and excel, to conform and perform, which just as well applies to their teachers. Schooling in a burnout society prioritizes achievement, productivity, and always doing something: “No time to waste” and “keep busy” are mandatory. Not incidentally, the etymological meaning of scholar, from Ancient Greek, σχολή (skholḗ), has to do with leisure or free time: a far cry from the contemporary scene of school learning. Given all this, contemplativeness cannot even take root in the mind-body-hearts that are constantly pressured to strive, perform, and achieve. More than anything, children (and teachers, too) need rest and restfulness. However, inactivity does not automatically guarantee that rest is found. Hence, my current research explores ways to create space/spaciousness in which children can experience restfulness while engaging in curricular activities. To this extent, I propose rest and restfulness as contemplative practice. I inquire how to create or allow oases of rest in the classroom through activities that incorporate reflective practices as an extension of curriculum content. I use my own reflective journaling to analyze and show how reflective writing among other practices can be contemplative and result in an overall feeling of restfulness for students and teacher alike.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".