Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two Sisters received support from the Canada Council for the Arts. It was exhibited, in 2004, in the main exhibition space at Manx Museum (Douglas, Isle of Man, British Isles) as well as the Mediatheque Francois Mitterand (Poitiers, France). For each exhibition, the gallery space was transformed into a circular journey, challenging the visitors’ understanding of linear time and life narrative. A sound room was built in the centre of the gallery where sound bled into the whole space. Through the use of sound, photographs and objects, the emotions of past wars jut into the present. The layout, the immediacy of sound, stillness of the photographs and objects on display intended to engage visitors through an evocation of feelings and senses.<br/><br/>To coincide with the Two Sisters exhibition at the Mediatheque Francois Mitterand in Poitiers, an evening program included a presentation by Prof Marc Charpentier called: 'Berlin: ville de memoire et de creation: le contexte de Deux Soeurs' , which addressed the context of the Two Sisters project.<br/><br/>Exhibition reviewed in: <br/>La Nouvelle Republique, 12 March 2004, France<br/>Centre Presse 28 March 2004, France<br/>Le Carnets de la Mediatheque Poitiers March/April 2004
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".