MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125683058 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18378870

Catoptria trichostomus

2025· article· W7125683058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Graziano Bassi, Peter Huemer

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhallus (fungus)HabitusBlack maleMale genitaliaType (biology)White (mutation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catoptria trichostomus (Christoph, 1858) (Figs 9, 10, 41, 49) Crambus trichostomus Christoph, 1858. Type locality: [Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador] Labrador. Type material: ZISP. Catoptria tristis Kirpichnikova, 1994: 128. Type locality: Russia, Koryak Autonomous Okrug, Apuka e Magadan Region, Tenkinsky District. Type material: ZISP. Sinev 2008, Catalogue Lepidoptera Russia: 174, 334 (syn. n. of C. trichostoma). Material examined: Canada: 1 male, Head of Clyde Inlet, Baffin Id, N.W. T., 29.vii.1950, Wynne Edwards leg, GS 3034 GB, NHMUK; 1 female, Baffin I., Cumberland Peninsula, Penny Highland area, 24.vii.1953, A. Watson leg, GS 3035 GB, NHMUK; Russia: 1 male, Sarepta, ex Coll. C. Reutti, GS 1366 GB, SMNK; 1 female, Polar – Ural, 9.vii.1977, leg. K.F. Sedych, GS 4348 GB, RCGB. Diagnosis: The habitus of C. trichostomus (Figs 9, 10) is somewhat similar to that of C. hannemanni (Figs 7, 8) and to that of the female of C. orientellus (Fig. 6); however, the forewing has a short medial stripe interrupted by a large antemedial blackish-brown band, and a large postmedial white band angled at veins M1 and then at M2. The male genitalia (Fig. 41) feature with a stocky, upturned pars basalis, the phallus with two subapical small teeth and the vesica with about twelve cornuti, are unlike those of all related species. The female genitalia (Fig. 49) are similar to those of C. hannemanni (Fig. 50) and C. spodiellus (Fig. 48); however, the sterigma is produced and bilobed, and the ductus bursae is slightly sclerotized and strongly enlarged basally, as opposed to the sterigma being simple, with lateral cup-shaped projections, and the ductus bursae being less enlarged basally, strongly sclerotized and wrinkled in C. hannemanni and the sterigma being notched and rounded with a ductus bursae slightly sclerotized and narrow in C. spodiellus. Distribution: Holarctic species: Canada, polar Russia, USA: Alaska. The examined male labelled “Sarepta” (Volgograd Oblast) is possibly mislabelled. Detailed distribution in Russia in Streltzov (2010, Fig. 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207