MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Beyond Post-Development Theory: Critically Considering Architects, Culture, Context + International Development

2024· article· W7125808609 on OpenAlex
Farhad Mortezaee, Brian Robert Sinclair

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)EthnographyInternational developmentWork (physics)ArchitectureInternational community

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-Development theorists have challenged the act of international development, however more recent literature especially by academics from countries receiving aid, suggests otherwise (Matthews, 2004). Utilizing appreciative inquiry (Salama, 2017) the authors explore and provide an environmental scan of the contemporary landscape where architects are currently involved in international development. The research features and compares a few reviews by architects (among other design practitioners), social scientists (particularly development ethnographers) and feedback from their host communities. This paper aims to better understand how ethnographic research – most notably as manifest in thick descriptions -- amongst other social sciences, informs architects’ designs beyond adopting simplistic and formalistic design motifs. Complementing major gaps in the literature, the authors utilize recent personal projects as reflective practitioners (Bierwolf, 2017). The authors interrogate how decolonizing international development has impacted architectural projects (Samuel, 2014). Finally, the work builds upon the idea of ‘collective wisdom of the wide array of stakeholders, professionals, politicians, decision-makers, and citizens (both engaged and disenfranchised) who have the will and wherewithal to make a difference and to make the world safer, healthier, and better.’ (Sinclair, 2015) The tension between modernity and tradition, and the international and the vernacular, are critically considered. Architects play important roles in helping with decision-making processes throughout a development project (Gao, 2016). When local architects design projects they empower local populations (Widiarso, 2018). Methods deployed in the present research include literature review and logical argumentation. Informed by the literature and guided by tacit knowing of the authors as experienced and embedded practitioners, the paper concludes with a conceptual frame that proffers insights into the ways that architects’ engagement in international development is perceived by themselves, their own communities of practice, social scientists and the host communities. Further, the frame offers guidance around engagement in complex and multi-faceted international development projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it